From: | "Webb Sprague" <webb(dot)sprague(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Why can't I put a BEFORE EACH ROW trigger on a view? |
Date: | 2007-02-25 00:55:45 |
Message-ID: | b11ea23c0702241655l4365c82byde85487b62935d4c@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
I also think that a view is supposed to be just that -- a *view* of
underlying data, which in no way modifies the data. I don't know much
about the design ideas behind SQL, but I think this view of views
(haha) is an underlying assumption. If you are modifying data when
you do a select on a view, you are probably not using SQL the way it
was intended (not that that is a bad thing, but ...)
Postgresql has "rules" which I *think* can rewrite select statements.
Rules are kind of a pain, but maybe what you want.
On 2/24/07, Webb Sprague <webb(dot)sprague(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >. I have _additional_
> > constraints to place on modifications done through
> > views, and trickyness involved in modifying the
> > underlying tables.
>
> Write a function foo that returns a set, then a view: "create view as
> select * from foo()". Incorporate all the trickiness in the function,
> including variables, multiple temporary tables, whatever you need.
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Karl O. Pinc | 2007-02-25 01:11:22 | Re: Why can't I put a BEFORE EACH ROW trigger on a view? |
Previous Message | Webb Sprague | 2007-02-25 00:51:27 | Re: Why can't I put a BEFORE EACH ROW trigger on a view? |