From: | "codeWarrior" <GPatnude(at)adelphia(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: DBD::Pg & DBD::PgPP Cpan question |
Date: | 2003-01-22 14:01:36 |
Message-ID: | b0m7qm$2ijr$1@news.hub.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
DBD::PgPP is a "Pure Perl" driver -- Which I believe the author means there
are no compiled C libraries in his implementation .. I dont think that using
PgPP because it has a ppd file is a good excuse for using it...
DBD::Pg is the DBD:Pg that we all know and love...
"Ian Barwick" <barwick(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote in message
news:200301221136(dot)45477(dot)barwick(at)gmx(dot)net(dot)(dot)(dot)
> On Wednesday 22 January 2003 00:11, Williams, Travis L, NPONS wrote:
> > All,
> > I have noticed that they have replaced DBD::Pg with DBD::PgPP in cpan.
>
> "They" haven't been doing anything of the sort, I hope ;-).
>
> http://cpan.org/modules/by-module/DBD/
>
> has the latest DBD::Pg version ...
>
> > Also if you use windows PPM that you can't get DBD::Pg that way.. only
> > DBD::PgPP.. I understand the difference between the two modules.. but is
it
> > really a replacement.. or 2 different modules.. in my mind its two
> > different modules.. and they should both be listed. Has DBD::PgPP been
> > tested?
>
> They are very different modules. I have no idea about DBD::PgPP though.
>
> Ian Barwick
> barwick(at)gmx(dot)net
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2003-01-22 14:43:46 | Re: Fw: configure error with krb5 |
Previous Message | Dan Delaney | 2003-01-22 13:40:46 | Re: Error at end of pg_dump output (setting sequence number?) |