Re: parallel workers and client encoding

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: parallel workers and client encoding
Date: 2016-06-14 02:29:29
Message-ID: b0e065fa-6393-eea8-524a-59032ab2d5c6@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 6/9/16 7:16 PM, Tatsuo Ishii wrote:
> Something like SetClientEncoding(GetDatabaseEncoding()) is a Little
> bit ugly. It would be nice if we could have a switch to turn off the
> automatic encoding conversion in the future, but for 9.6, I feel I'm
> fine with your proposed patch.

One way to make this nicer would be to put the encoding of a string into
the StringInfoData structure.

--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Noah Misch 2016-06-14 02:44:06 Re: Should phraseto_tsquery('simple', 'blue blue') @@ to_tsvector('simple', 'blue') be true ?
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2016-06-14 02:27:24 Re: parallel workers and client encoding