| From: | Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: injection points for hash aggregation |
| Date: | 2025-02-04 05:35:52 |
| Message-ID: | b0ca04a74fc9b7ceaafb2099daba7d6eb4fc2271.camel@j-davis.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, 2025-02-04 at 12:50 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 04, 2025 at 09:21:49AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> > Being able to pass down some runtime states to a callback is
> > something
> > I've drafted a patch for, as of:
> > https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/Z23zcE4w1djukkva@paquier.xyz
>
> Oops. I've posted an incorrect link here, I meant this one instead:
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/Za8zWmPTNJk_iJzz@paquier.xyz
I replied in that thread. Thank you.
The injection point arguments are required for $SUBJECT, or at least
not yet, so we can proceed with this thread independently.
Regards,
Jeff Davis
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2025-02-04 05:50:23 | Re: new commitfest transition guidance |
| Previous Message | Jeff Davis | 2025-02-04 05:30:33 | Re: Adding facility for injection points (or probe points?) for more advanced tests |