From: | "Chris Velevitch" <chris(dot)velevitch(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: pg_dump ignoring without oids |
Date: | 2008-04-04 05:44:44 |
Message-ID: | b0a3bf780804032244l7f6fd429md8e3d2d66d3a57ef@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 4:33 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> "Chris Velevitch" <chris(dot)velevitch(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 2:50 PM, Chris Velevitch
> > <chris(dot)velevitch(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >> In the mean time, which download has only the 7.4 utils and can that
> >> be installed without removing my 8.1 utils.
>
> > I'm using Centos 5.
>
> Um ... Red Hat, who are about as conservative as they come on this type
> of issue, shipped PG 8.1.x in RHEL 5. Which benighted PHB decreed that
> you should be using 7.4.x?
We're using a shared hosting database service. They were using 7.4
when we first started using them and they haven't upgraded unless we
pay them to. We are their only pg customer.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
--
Chris
--
Chris Velevitch
Manager - Sydney Flash Platform Developers Group
m: 0415 469 095
www.flashdev.org.au
Sydney Flash Platform Developers Group
April meeting: TBD
Date: Mon 28th April 6pm for 6:30 start
Details soon
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Pavan Deolasee | 2008-04-04 05:48:59 | Re: [HACKERS] ANALYZE getting dead tuple count hopelessly wrong |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2008-04-04 05:40:35 | Re: [HACKERS] ANALYZE getting dead tuple count hopelessly wrong |