Re: User documentation vs Official Docs

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "Psql_General (E-mail)" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: User documentation vs Official Docs
Date: 2018-07-16 22:19:16
Message-ID: b046d8a2-ff24-7cb3-1e5e-f833dd454174@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On 07/16/2018 03:14 PM, David G. Johnston wrote:
>
> What does the community think about a community run, community
> organized, sub project for USER documentation? This type of
> documentation would be things like, "10 steps to configure
> replication", "Dumb simple Postgres backups",  "5 things to NEVER
> do with Postgres". I imagine we would sort it by version (9.6/10.0
> etc...) as well as break it down via type (Administration, Tuning,
> Gotchas) etc...
>
> What do we think?
>
>
> ​Politely tell them to buy some of the many well written books that
> are available on these very topics...

Politely tell them to buy a license to MSSQl...

Kind of misses the whole point doesn't it?

JD

>
> David J.
>

--
Command Prompt, Inc. || http://the.postgres.company/ || @cmdpromptinc
*** A fault and talent of mine is to tell it exactly how it is. ***
PostgreSQL centered full stack support, consulting and development.
Advocate: @amplifypostgres || Learn: https://postgresconf.org
***** Unless otherwise stated, opinions are my own. *****

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tim Cross 2018-07-16 22:21:46 Re: Do we need yet another IDE (SQL development assistant) for PostgreSQL?
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2018-07-16 22:18:43 Re: User documentation vs Official Docs