From: | David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Rui DeSousa <rui(dot)desousa(at)icloud(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
Cc: | pgsql-admin(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Reliable WAL file shipping over unreliable network |
Date: | 2018-03-06 18:47:35 |
Message-ID: | b01c51be-2f5d-a158-7e8b-be39b5e99162@pgmasters.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin |
On 3/6/18 12:55 PM, Rui DeSousa wrote:
>
>> On Mar 5, 2018, at 10:02 AM, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net
>> <mailto:sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>> wrote:
>>
>> It doesn’t- but please don't encourage partial solutions which have
>> ver clear issues.
>
> Then problem is there are no good base utilities that is useful with
> archive_command; unless you’re writing directly to an NFS mount or a
> tape library.
It's true that there are no good base utilities for this purpose, not
sure why NFS would be an exception, though.
> Even Barman recommends rsync with the archive_command; if
> you are unable to use pg_receivexlog solution. There are
> countless Postgres documentation out there that recommends use of rsync
> with the archive_command.
Also true, even though rsync has show itself to be a poor tool for
database backups.
> Here a solution that will fsync() file on the other end.
At a quick glance, that looks like it would work.
But why go through the trouble when pgBackRest does all of that (and
much more), and does not rely on rsync? You are obviously knowledgeable
and like to do it yourself, but not everybody wants to develop a
solution from scratch, test it, and maintain it.
Regards,
--
-David
david(at)pgmasters(dot)net
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Rui DeSousa | 2018-03-06 18:53:57 | Re: Reliable WAL file shipping over unreliable network |
Previous Message | Rui DeSousa | 2018-03-06 17:55:20 | Re: Reliable WAL file shipping over unreliable network |