| From: | "James Moe" <jimoe(at)sohnen-moe(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Postgresql General Mail List" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Recomended FS |
| Date: | 2003-10-21 14:16:45 |
| Message-ID: | auto-000000751720@sohnen-moe.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 21 Oct 2003 18:56:52 +1300, Mark Kirkwood wrote:
>
>Note that even including the card, this is a very cheap setup.
>
Yes, this is the single advantage of IDE vs SCSI. If the price of the storage system
is the *only* consideration, IDE is the way to go.
SCSI has a long history of providing sustained throughput for server systems.
IDE has a short history of providing very cheap storage for desktops.
- --
jimoe at sohnen-moe dot com
pgp/gpg public key: http://www.keyserver.net/en/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGPfreeware 5.0 OS/2 for non-commercial use
Comment: PGP 5.0 for OS/2
Charset: cp850
wj8DBQE/lT/NsxxMki0foKoRAvQMAKDKcQipqioww6aVc+kbCXUAdLtLUwCfe2Wo
Zdkcklqi45qBXpRsznne3QE=
=H19u
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2003-10-21 14:17:54 | Re: how to use pg_resetxlog |
| Previous Message | Teodor Sigaev | 2003-10-21 13:50:26 | Re: About TSearch2 Performance |