From: | Gerhard Hintermayer <g(dot)hintermayer(at)inode(dot)at> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: pgtcl has no coresponding function to PQcmdTuples |
Date: | 2002-11-26 19:43:03 |
Message-ID: | as0krf$s8n$1@news.hub.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-interfaces |
Artur Trzewik wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I have noticed that
> pg_result $handle -numTuples
> result always 0 after DELETE and UPDATE command
>
> I have taken a look in the source code of pgtcl
> and I see
pg_execute is your friend, see below ...
>
> [...]
>
> (better were to use Tcl_GetIndexFromObj an not strcmp,
> sprintf(interp->result,...) is also unsafe and very historical
> It should be Tcl_SetObjResult(interp, Tcl_NewIntObj(PQcmdTuples(result)));
> It do not look good
>
> By the way.
> pgtcl uses very old tcl interface (up to version 7)
> using new interface would increase speed about 30-40%.
> It also do not carry about UTF in new Tcl (new means about 2 years).
> It hurts me to see that old tcl interfaces slow up tcl (and another say it is
> slow).
>
> I can upgrade it (I have done it for mysqltcl) if there are need for it.
> I need conntact to pgtcl maintainer/autor.
>
> best regards,
> Artur Trzewik
Already done, see
http://gborg.postgresql.org/project/pgtcl/
and also the announcement at c.l.t:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=pgtcl+group:comp.lang.tcl.*&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&safe=off&selm=1037426192.509154%40nntp1.bsj.jax.superconnect.net&rnum=1
--
Gerhard Hintermayer
http://www.inode.at/g.hintermayer
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2002-11-26 21:39:34 | Re: pgtcl has no coresponding function to PQcmdTuples |
Previous Message | johnnnnnn | 2002-11-26 19:24:24 | Re: Difference in the actual and extracted values of timestamp |