| From: | Mike Porter <mike(at)udel(dot)edu> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: grouping treated as keyword in function return table |
| Date: | 2016-07-12 17:13:51 |
| Message-ID: | alpine.OSX.2.20.1607121312040.45959@qbp.aff.hqry.rqh |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
On Tue, 12 Jul 2016, Tom Lane wrote:
> Mike Porter <mike(at)udel(dot)edu> writes:
>> On Tue, 12 Jul 2016, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> Only since 9.5, because GROUPING wasn't a keyword before that.
>>> Sure you're using 9.5 pg_dump?
>
>> My notes say so.
>> /usr/local/postgresql-9.5.3/bin/pg_dumpall -h a.server -U postgres > 9.5.3.sql
>
> Hm, is the source server 9.5? I think that the TABLE clause is actually
> generated server-side in this case.
The source server is 9.3.5 (9.3...)
> When you're making a dump you intend to load into a different server
> version, we recommend using --quote-all-identifiers to make sure you're
> not blindsided by identifiers that have become reserved words in the
> newer server version.
Great advice. Thanks, Mike
>
> regards, tom lane
>
-
Mike Porter
PGP Fingerprint: F4 AE E1 9F 67 F7 DA EA 2F D2 37 F3 99 ED D1 C2
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | david | 2016-07-12 17:58:55 | BUG #14245: Segfault on weird to_tsquery |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2016-07-12 16:58:20 | Re: grouping treated as keyword in function return table |