| From: | Sergey Koposov <koposov(at)ast(dot)cam(dot)ac(dot)uk> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Curious buildfarm failures (fwd) |
| Date: | 2013-01-16 15:03:52 |
| Message-ID: | alpine.LRH.2.03.1301161446170.11753@ast.cam.ac.uk |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, 16 Jan 2013, Andres Freund wrote:
>> So unless somebody suggest otherwise, i'm going to switch to gcc on this
>> buildfarm.
>
> What about switching to -O1 of 11.1?
I don't know. It is up to -hackers to decide. I think that icc on ia64
have shown bugginess time after time. But if you think that buildfarm
with icc 11.1 -O1 carry more information than say running gcc, i can
still run icc.
S
*****************************************************
Sergey E. Koposov, PhD, Research Associate
Institute of Astronomy, University of Cambridge
Madingley road, CB3 0HA, Cambridge, UK
Tel: +44-1223-337-551 Web: http://www.ast.cam.ac.uk/~koposov/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2013-01-16 15:08:33 | Re: log_lock_waits to identify transaction's relation |
| Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2013-01-16 14:56:20 | Re: Curious buildfarm failures (fwd) |