| From: | Rich Shepard <rshepard(at)appl-ecosys(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Pre-version pg_upgrade syntax check |
| Date: | 2020-02-10 23:30:51 |
| Message-ID: | alpine.LNX.2.20.2002101529200.4839@salmo.appl-ecosys.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Mon, 10 Feb 2020, Adrian Klaver wrote:
>> I don't know that the port numbers are required.
> They are not: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/12/pgupgrade.html
> "Obviously, no one should be accessing the clusters during the upgrade.
> pg_upgrade defaults to running servers on port 50432 to avoid unintended
> client connections. You can use the same port number for both clusters
> when doing an upgrade because the old and new clusters will not be running
> at the same time. However, when checking an old running server, the old
> and new port numbers must be different."
Adrian,
As I'm the only user of the databases, and both are shut down, I assumed
specifying port numbers was not needed.
>> Have I missed an option?
> Not a required one. Best way to find out is to run --check.
Good advice; I'll do that.
Thanks,
Rich
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Rich Shepard | 2020-02-10 23:40:22 | Re: Pre-version pg_upgrade syntax check |
| Previous Message | Adrian Klaver | 2020-02-10 22:59:24 | Re: Pre-version pg_upgrade syntax check |