Re: Broken postgres links need to find callers

From: Rich Shepard <rshepard(at)appl-ecosys(dot)com>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Broken postgres links need to find callers
Date: 2018-10-31 18:48:56
Message-ID: alpine.LNX.2.20.1810311142570.26169@salmo.appl-ecosys.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Wed, 31 Oct 2018, Andrew Gierth wrote:

> Is there a pg_config binary in /usr/lib/postgresql/10.3/bin/ and if so,
> what is the output of /usr/lib/postgresql/10.3/bin/pg_config --sharedir

Andrew,

Yes, pg_config is present but pointing to the wrong directory:
# /usr/lib/postgresql/10.3/bin/pg_config --sharedir
/usr/share/postgresql-10.2

However, the file dates are that of the upgrade from 10.2 to 10.3:

-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 7096448 Mar 1 2018 postgres*
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 8 Mar 1 2018 postmaster -> postgres*
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 514732 Mar 1 2018 psql*

and the postgres version is 10.3:

> Also what is the output of /usr/lib/postgresql/10.3/bin/postgres -V

# /usr/lib/postgresql/10.3/bin/postgres -V
postgres (PostgreSQL) 10.3

> The most plausible explanation I can see for what you're seeing there is
> that what you have as /usr/lib/postgresql/10.3/bin/postgres is not
> actually the 10.3 binary but rather the 10.2 one. There should be no
> symlinks involved there - the path that is reported in the error message
> is the one that the postgres binary actually did try to open.

Can pg_config be corrected independent of anything else. That seems to be
where the blockage is found.

Thanks,

Rich

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Adrian Klaver 2018-10-31 18:58:50 Re: Broken postgres links need to find callers
Previous Message Andrew Gierth 2018-10-31 18:37:04 Re: Broken postgres links need to find callers