From: | Rich Shepard <rshepard(at)appl-ecosys(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Upgrade: 9.0.5->9.3.3 |
Date: | 2014-03-17 23:36:33 |
Message-ID: | alpine.LNX.2.11.1403171627070.20082@localhost |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Mon, 17 Mar 2014, Tom Lane wrote:
> I'm guessing from those path names that you are using self-compiled
> executables, not somebody's packaging? If the latter, whose? I'm
> confused as to how you got pg_upgrade installed without knowing where it
> came from.
Tom,
Both were buit with scripts from SlackBuilds.org. The 9.0.5 pg_upgrade in
/opt/postgresql-9.0.5/contrib/ is datestamped Sep 22, 2011; I don't see that
I actually built and installed it or pg_upgrade_support (that's also there
as source, but neither built nor installed). Three-and-a-half years later
I've no recollection from where I downloaded them.
> contrib is part of the main PG distribution. The sources for pg_upgrade
> would be under contrib/pg_upgrade/ in an unpacked tarball, and
> pg_upgrade_support lives next door in contrib/pg_upgrade_support/. If you
> did a "make install" in contrib/ that would've installed both.
A-ha! Running 'pg_upgrade --help' tells me that it is, indeed, installed.
And, it is the version for -9.3.3, too. So, this question's been answered.
> That's pretty much the base case. If none of the other options appeal to
> you, don't use 'em.
Nah, nothing looks like I need them.
Much appreciated,
Rich
--
Richard B. Shepard, Ph.D. | Have knowledge, will travel.
Applied Ecosystem Services, Inc. |
www.appl-ecosys.com Voice: 503-667-4517 Fax: 503-667-8863
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jeff Janes | 2014-03-18 06:04:22 | Re: pgpgout/s without swapping--what does it mean? |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2014-03-17 23:26:08 | Re: Upgrade: 9.0.5->9.3.3 |