Re: postgresql.conf suggestions?

From: Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com>
To: Kobby Dapaah <kdapaah(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: postgresql.conf suggestions?
Date: 2009-05-21 05:47:52
Message-ID: alpine.GSO.2.01.0905201353120.3025@westnet.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On Wed, 20 May 2009, Kobby Dapaah wrote:

> shared_buffers = 2048MB
> effective_cache_size = 5400MB

You should consider seriously increasing effective_cache_size. You might
also double or quadruple shared_buffers from 2GB, but going much higher
may not buy you much--most people seem to find diminishing returns
increasing that beyond the 10GB range.

> bgwriter_delay = 10ms
> bgwriter_lru_maxpages = 0

I found that bg_writer_delay doesn't really work so well when set to this
small. It doesn't actually matter right now though, because you're
turning the background writer off by setting brwriter_lru_maxpages=0.
Just wanted to point this out because if you increase that later it may
pop up as a concern, small values for the delay make it more likely you'll
need to increase the multiplier to a higher value for background writing
to work well.

Robert's message already mentions the other things you should consider,
particularly work_mem.

--
* Greg Smith gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com http://www.gregsmith.com Baltimore, MD

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Daniel Ferreira 2009-05-21 11:42:46 query planner uses sequencial scan instead of index scan
Previous Message Robert Haas 2009-05-21 03:09:52 Re: postgresql.conf suggestions?