Re: Now I am back, next thing. Final PGS tuning.

From: Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com>
To: "Massa, Harald Armin" <chef(at)ghum(dot)de>
Cc: Bill Moran <wmoran(at)potentialtech(dot)com>, Jennifer Trey <jennifer(dot)trey(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Now I am back, next thing. Final PGS tuning.
Date: 2009-04-08 15:52:38
Message-ID: alpine.GSO.2.01.0904081150340.24828@westnet.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Wed, 8 Apr 2009, Massa, Harald Armin wrote:

> "documenting" that for the wiki is still on my backlog; so, here:
> shared_buffers of PostgreSQL on Windows != shared_buffers of PostgreSQL on Unix

There's already comments about that in the shared_buffers section of
http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Tuning_Your_PostgreSQL_Server

--
* Greg Smith gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com http://www.gregsmith.com Baltimore, MD

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ian Mayo 2009-04-08 15:56:35 Re: Are there performance advantages in storing bulky field in separate table?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2009-04-08 15:47:43 Re: Are there performance advantages in storing bulky field in separate table?