From: | Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr> |
---|---|
To: | Anastasia Lubennikova <a(dot)lubennikova(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jaime Soler <jaime(dot)soler(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: pgbench and timestamps (bounced) |
Date: | 2020-11-26 23:08:26 |
Message-ID: | alpine.DEB.2.22.394.2011262358470.3117595@pseudo |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> CFM reminder.
>
> Hi, this entry is "Waiting on Author" and the thread was inactive for a
> while. I see this discussion still has some open questions. Are you
> going to continue working on it, or should I mark it as "returned with
> feedback" until a better time?
IMHO the proposed fix is reasonable and addresses the issue.
I have responded to Tom's remarks about it, and it is waiting for his
answer to my counter arguments. So ISTM that the patch is currently still
waiting for some feedback.
--
Fabien.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2020-11-26 23:20:28 | Re: Improving spin-lock implementation on ARM. |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2020-11-26 22:55:36 | Re: Improving spin-lock implementation on ARM. |