| From: | Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, daniel(at)manitou-mail(dot)org, peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com, iwata(dot)aya(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: psql - add SHOW_ALL_RESULTS option |
| Date: | 2020-01-16 21:36:42 |
| Message-ID: | alpine.DEB.2.21.2001162233530.18871@pseudo |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> My own vote would be to use the initial patch (after applying any
> unrelated changes per later review), ie. add the feature with its
> disable button.
I can do that, but not if there is a veto from Tom on the feature.
I wish definite negative opinions by senior committers would be expressed
earlier, so that people do not spend time rewiewing dead code and
developing even deader code.
--
Fabien.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tomas Vondra | 2020-01-16 21:38:20 | Re: Recognizing superuser in pg_hba.conf |
| Previous Message | Tomas Vondra | 2020-01-16 21:33:58 | Re: FETCH FIRST clause PERCENT option |