Re: Why does pg_checksums -r not have a long option?

From: Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Why does pg_checksums -r not have a long option?
Date: 2019-05-26 06:35:30
Message-ID: alpine.DEB.2.21.1905260832240.27800@lancre
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


> Subject: Why does pg_checksums -r not have a long option?
>
> Was this just forgotten?

Probably? Attached a patch.

--
Fabien.

Attachment Content-Type Size
checksums-long-option-1.patch text/x-diff 1.7 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message didier 2019-05-26 07:41:23 Re: [HACKERS] Small fix: avoid passing null pointers to memcpy()
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2019-05-26 06:12:30 Why does pg_checksums -r not have a long option?