From: | Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr> |
---|---|
To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Michael Banck <michael(dot)banck(at)credativ(dot)de>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Sergei Kornilov <sk(at)zsrv(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Offline enabling/disabling of data checksums |
Date: | 2019-03-22 14:18:26 |
Message-ID: | alpine.DEB.2.21.1903221514390.2198@lancre |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> Done the switch for this case. For pg_rewind actually I think that this
> is an area where its logic could be improved a bit. So first the data
> folder is synced, and then the control file is updated.
Attached is a quick patch about "pg_rewind", so that the control file is
updated after everything else is committed to disk.
--
Fabien.
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
rewind-fsync-1.patch | text/x-diff | 1.4 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | David Rowley | 2019-03-22 14:30:27 | Re: Ordered Partitioned Table Scans |
Previous Message | Fabien COELHO | 2019-03-22 13:59:31 | Re: Offline enabling/disabling of data checksums |