Re: pg_dumpall --exclude-database option

From: Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Subject: Re: pg_dumpall --exclude-database option
Date: 2018-10-31 17:24:44
Message-ID: alpine.DEB.2.21.1810311821070.12518@lancre
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


> :-( My fault, I just created a new one.

Hmmm... so did I:-) We did it a few minutes apart. I did not find yours
when I first searched, then I proceeded to try to move the previous CF
entry which had been marked as "returned" but this was rejected, so I
recreated the one without checking whether it had appeared in between.

Hopefully someone can remove it…

--
Fabien.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2018-10-31 17:30:52 Re: Is there way to detect uncommitted 'new table' in pg_class?
Previous Message Pavel Stehule 2018-10-31 17:19:01 Re: ToDo: show size of partitioned table