Re: Odd behavior with 'currval'

From: Steven Hirsch <snhirsch(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Francisco Olarte <folarte(at)peoplecall(dot)com>
Cc: Steven Hirsch <snhirsch(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Odd behavior with 'currval'
Date: 2018-02-09 19:05:09
Message-ID: alpine.DEB.2.20.1802091404300.5809@z87
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Fri, 9 Feb 2018, Francisco Olarte wrote:

>> I was trying to be careful and changed the address manually for all messages
>> except this one.
>
> Do not bother with that. The style in this list is to just reply to
> all, so the people that are participating in the thread can get a copy
> of the messages in both their inbox and the list folder when
> filtering. In fact I told gmail to skip inbox for the list, as I read
> it fully normally, but if I hadn't do that and there was a traffic
> spike it would be easier for me to first answer the threads Iwas
> involved in and then reading the rest. In fact traffic is not that
> high, and I do reply to the messages which show "me" in the gmail list
> first, then the rest.

Heh. There is no winning in this situation. I have been hauled over hot
coals in other mailing lists for replying to 'All' :-).

--

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Clive Anglin 2018-02-10 00:44:23 Migrating Postgresql from Linux x86
Previous Message Francisco Olarte 2018-02-09 18:42:22 Re: Odd behavior with 'currval'