From: | Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr> |
---|---|
To: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Haribabu Kommi <kommi(dot)haribabu(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jeevan Ladhe <jeevan(dot)ladhe(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: pgbench more operators & functions |
Date: | 2017-05-30 09:47:26 |
Message-ID: | alpine.DEB.2.20.1705301135500.30762@lancre |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> The patch looks ok,
Ok.
> but the main issue is missing regress tests.
Yes, I agree.
> I know so it is another patch. But it should be placed differently
> 1. first patch - initial infrastructure for pgbench regress tests
> 2. this patch + related regress tests
Yep. I have no control about the display order, committers are too few and
overbooked, pgbench is not necessarily a priority, so I can only wait for
the non-regression test improvements to get committed some day before
updating/adding tests for the other patches in the queue (query result in
variable, utf8 variable names...).
--
Fabien.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Nikolay Shaplov | 2017-05-30 10:15:47 | Re: pgbench tap tests & minor fixes |
Previous Message | Rafia Sabih | 2017-05-30 09:28:04 | Effect of changing the value for PARALLEL_TUPLE_QUEUE_SIZE |