| From: | Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr> |
|---|---|
| To: | Corey Huinker <corey(dot)huinker(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)bluetreble(dot)com>, Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl>, Daniel Verite <daniel(at)manitou-mail(dot)org>, PostgreSQL <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: \if, \elseif, \else, \endif (was Re: PSQL commands: \quit_if, \quit_unless) |
| Date: | 2017-02-03 05:57:30 |
| Message-ID: | alpine.DEB.2.20.1702030649280.3762@lancre |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hello Corey,
> Glad you like the barking. I'm happy to let the prompt issue rest for now,
> we can always add it later.
>
> If we DID want it, however, I don't think it'll be hard to add a special
> prompt (Thinking %T or %Y because they both look like branches, heh),
Ah!:-) T may stand for Tree, but Y looks a little bit more like branches.
Maybe Y for Yew.
> With a prompt1 of '%T> ' Would then resolve to "ttfi" [...]
> This is just idle musing, I'm perfectly happy to leave it out entirely.
I like it. I would prefer to have it available, but my advice is to follow
committer' opinions. At the minimum, there must be some trace, either
"barking" or "prompting".
--
Fabien.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Pavel Stehule | 2017-02-03 06:16:44 | Re: proposal: session server side variables |
| Previous Message | Pavel Stehule | 2017-02-03 05:56:18 | Re: proposal: session server side variables |