Re: checkpointer continuous flushing

From: Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: checkpointer continuous flushing
Date: 2016-03-22 10:02:58
Message-ID: alpine.DEB.2.10.1603221101020.8198@sto
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


> My impression is that we actually know what we need to know anyway?

Sure, the overall summary is "it is much better with the patch" on this
large SSD test, which is good news because the patch was really designed
to help with HDDs.

--
Fabien.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alexander Korotkov 2016-03-22 10:08:01 Re: Move PinBuffer and UnpinBuffer to atomics
Previous Message Fabien COELHO 2016-03-22 10:00:51 Re: checkpointer continuous flushing