From: | Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr> |
---|---|
To: | Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: PATCH: numeric timestamp in log_line_prefix |
Date: | 2015-08-22 19:54:40 |
Message-ID: | alpine.DEB.2.10.1508222137590.11010@sto |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hello Tomas,
Review of v2:
> attached is a v2 of the patch, reworked based on the comments.
The patch applies cleanly to head, it compiles, I tested it and it mostly
work as expected, see below.
> 1) fix the docs (explicitly say that it's a Unix epoch)
I would add the word "numeric" in front of timestamp both in the doc and
in the postgresql.conf.sample, as it justifies the chosen %n.
> 2) handle 'padding' properly
I tried that without success. ISTM that what is padded is the empty
string, and the timestamp is just printed on its own without padding
afterwards.
I think that it should use a string buffer and then used the padding on
the string, as case 'c' or 't' for instance.
> 3) get rid of timestamp_str - use appendString* methods directly
See above, I'm afraid it is necessary for padding, because there are two
formatted fields.
> 4) support just the "with milliseconds" using '%n' escape sequence
Ok.
> All those changes are quite trivial. The only annoying bit is that both '%u'
> and '%e' are already used, so none of the obvious choices for 'Unix Epoch'
> are available. So I simply took (%m+1) which is %n.
It stands for "numeric" as well, so I think it is quite nice.
--
Fabien.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Greg Stark | 2015-08-22 21:34:08 | Re: PostgreSQL for VAX on NetBSD/OpenBSD |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2015-08-22 19:53:20 | Re: Error message with plpgsql CONTINUE |