| From: | Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pg_stat_statements cluttered with "DEALLOCATE dbdpg_p*" |
| Date: | 2014-07-20 15:17:39 |
| Message-ID: | alpine.DEB.2.10.1407201710580.16752@sto |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
>> That's because PREPARE isn't executed as it's own statement, but done on
>> the protocol level (which will need noticeably fewer messages). There's
>> no builtin logic to ignore actual PREPARE statements.
>
> ISTM that there is indeed a special handling in function
> pgss_ProcessUtility for PREPARE and EXECUTE:
>
> [...]
For completeness purpose, here is the one-liner patch to handle DEALLOCATE
as PREPARE & EXECUTE are handled. It is cleaner than the other one, but
then DEALLOCATE disappear from the table, as PREPARE and EXECUTE do.
--
Fabien.
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| pgss-norm-deallocate-simple.patch | text/x-diff | 956 bytes |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andres Freund | 2014-07-20 15:28:04 | Re: pg_stat_statements cluttered with "DEALLOCATE dbdpg_p*" |
| Previous Message | Fabien COELHO | 2014-07-20 15:01:50 | Re: pg_stat_statements cluttered with "DEALLOCATE dbdpg_p*" |