From: | Fabien <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr> |
---|---|
To: | PostgreSQL Bugs List <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | "with recursive" ignores side effects? |
Date: | 2013-08-06 18:51:01 |
Message-ID: | alpine.DEB.2.02.1308062030390.29999@localhost6.localdomain6 |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
I have an unexpected issue with a side effects on a table which is ignored
by a recursive query. I've tried to simplify the issue to a simple
example, see the attached sql script.
Version 1 results in:
it / fid / stuff / foo full contents
0 | 0 | | {1:one,2:two}
1 | 1 | one | {1:one,2:*}
2 | 2 | two | {1:*,2:*}
The key issue for me is that table Foo is updated (as shown by the last
column), but although 'two' was updated to '*' by iteration 1, the last
iteration still sees the initial 'two' which does not exist anymore.
Version 2 illustrates more or less the behavior I would have expected.
I've read again Section 7.8 about WITH queries, but I have not seen
anything that would disprove my expectation.
Am I wrong somewhere? Or is this a subtle bug?
--
Fabien.
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
test.sql | application/x-sql | 1.6 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | David Johnston | 2013-08-06 19:21:24 | Re: "with recursive" ignores side effects? |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2013-08-06 16:27:19 | Re: BUG #8367: wrong example in 8.17.10 |