Re: [PATCH] add --throttle to pgbench (submission 3)

From: Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>
To: Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] add --throttle to pgbench (submission 3)
Date: 2013-05-28 11:52:51
Message-ID: alpine.DEB.2.02.1305281344500.12479@localhost6.localdomain6
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


>> You can try to use and improve the --progress option in another patch
>> submission which shows how things are going.

> That'll certainly be useful, but won't solve this issue. The thing is
> that with asynchronous replication you need to know how long it takes
> until all nodes are back in sync, with no replication lag.

> I can probably do it with a custom pgbench script, but I'm tempted to
> add support for timing that part separately with a "wait command" to run
> at the end of the benchmark.

ISTM that a separate process not related to pgbench should try to monitor
the master-slave async lag, as it is an interesting information anyway...

However I'm not sure that pg_stat_replication currently has the necessary
information on either side to measure the lag (in time transactions, but
how do I know when a transaction was committed? or number of
transactions?).

--
Fabien.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Szymon Guz 2013-05-28 12:04:00 storing plpython global pointer
Previous Message Pavel Stehule 2013-05-28 11:34:43 Re: plpgsql redesign (related to plpgsql check function)