| From: | Fabien COELHO <fabien(dot)coelho(at)mines-paristech(dot)fr> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robins Tharakan <tharakan(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Add more regression tests for dbcommands |
| Date: | 2013-05-13 15:36:28 |
| Message-ID: | alpine.DEB.2.02.1305131732440.1630@localhost6.localdomain6 |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
>> As for the cost, if the proposed tests are indeed too costly, what is not
>> necessarily the case for what I have seen, I do not think that it would be a
>> great problem to have two set of tests, with one a superset of the other,
>> with some convention.
>
> Well, tests like permission tests aren't the expensive part. The actual
> CREATE/DROP DATABASE you
Not me, but "Robins Tharakan".
> do is. The latter essentially are already tested by the buildfarm
> already.
Yep, that is what Tom was arguing.
> So, trimming the patch to do only the fast stuff should be less
> controversial?
Yes, I think so.
I think that allowing "expensive" tests such as a full archive or
replication setup would be nice as well, so maybe having several level of
tests would be a good thing anyway.
--
Fabien.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2013-05-13 15:36:55 | Re: lock support for aarch64 |
| Previous Message | Robins Tharakan | 2013-05-13 15:34:01 | Re: Add more regression tests for dbcommands |