Re: Warning: you don't own a lock of type ExclusiveLock

From: Gary Chambers <gwchamb(at)gwcmail(dot)com>
To: Chris Angelico <rosuav(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Warning: you don't own a lock of type ExclusiveLock
Date: 2012-02-09 15:35:08
Message-ID: alpine.DEB.2.00.1202091015310.25264@equinox.garychambers.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Chris (et al.),

Thanks for the reply. I have not replied sooner because I was hoping to get
some more feedback from the list.

>> I have a recently-migrated Pg cluster running 8.4.7 on Red Hat Enterprise
>> Linux Client release 5.7 (Tikanga) in a VMware VM that is logging the
>> subject warning. The application code is considerably old (deployed back
>> in the 7.4 days, I believe) and the message is preceded by a call to
>> select user_write_unlock(), which is a simple wrapper query that calls
>> pg_advisory_unlock(). What are the causes and possible problems and
>> side-effects of receiving such a log warning? Thank you for any
>> assistance you can provide.

Warning: you don't own a lock of type ExclusiveLock

> That means that you didn't have the lock you were trying to release.
> Whether that indicates a critical error or not depends on application
> logic.

The application appears to be functioning without issue, but I still have
some concerns. One possible cause of the warning I considered was having
the VM underlying storage NFS-mounted on a NetApp. Is it possible that
Postgres is not receiving a meaningful response with respect to
ExclusiveLock locking (i.e. unable to really obtain an ExclusiveLock) due to
VM "disk" residing on an NFS mount?

-- Gary Chambers

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2012-02-09 15:41:19 Re: VIEW still referring to old name of field
Previous Message Marti Raudsepp 2012-02-09 14:00:14 Re: SOUNDEX call