From: | Matthew Wakeling <matthew(at)flymine(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | "A(dot) Kretschmer" <andreas(dot)kretschmer(at)schollglas(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Sql result b where condition |
Date: | 2010-01-25 12:10:34 |
Message-ID: | alpine.DEB.2.00.1001251206470.6195@aragorn.flymine.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On Mon, 25 Jan 2010, A. Kretschmer wrote:
> In response to ramasubramanian :
>
> Please, create a new mail for a new topic and don't hijack other
> threads.
Even more so - this isn't probably the right mailing list for generic sql
help questions.
>> select ENAME,ORIG_SALARY from employee where (ename='Tom' and
>> orig_salary=2413)or(orig_salary=1234 )
>>
>> if the fist condition(ename='Tom' and orig_salary=2413) is satified then 10
>> rows will be returned, for the second condition (orig_salary=1234 ) there
>> are 20 rows will be returned.
>> The order of display should be
>>
>> The first 10 rows then
>> next 20 rows.
> select ENAME,ORIG_SALARY, 1 as my_order from employee where (ename='Tom' and
> orig_salary=2413) union all select ENAME,ORIG_SALARY, 2 employee where
> (orig_salary=1234 ) order by my_order.
Or just:
select ENAME,ORIG_SALARY from employee where (ename='Tom' and
orig_salary=2413)or(orig_salary=1234 ) ORDER BY orig_salary DESC
as there is going to be only two values for orig_salary.
Matthew
--
The early bird gets the worm. If you want something else for breakfast, get
up later.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | A. Kretschmer | 2010-01-25 12:24:00 | Re: Sql result b where condition |
Previous Message | Matthew Wakeling | 2010-01-25 11:59:41 | Re: Data Set Growth causing 26+hour runtime, on what we believe to be very simple SQL |