Re: Running some query in low priority

From: Matthew Wakeling <matthew(at)flymine(dot)org>
To: Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz <gryzman(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: S Arvind <arvindwill(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Running some query in low priority
Date: 2009-11-05 13:39:35
Message-ID: alpine.DEB.2.00.0911051335410.19472@aragorn.flymine.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On Thu, 5 Nov 2009, Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz wrote:
> If it is an insert of some sort, than divide it up. If it is a query that runs over data,
> use limits, and do it in small batches. Overall, divide in conquer approach works in
> these scenarios.

Unfortunately, dividing the work up can cause a much greater load, which
would make things worse. If you are inserting in smaller chunks and
committing more frequently that can reduce performance. If you split up
queries with limit and offset, that will just multiply the number of times
the query has to be run. Each time, the query will be evaluated, the first
<offset> rows thrown away, and the next <limit> rows returned, which will
waste a huge amount of time.

If you are inserting data, then use a COPY from stdin, and then you can
throttle the data stream. When you are querying, declare a cursor, and
fetch from it at a throttled rate.

Matthew

--
Bashir: The point is, if you lie all the time, nobody will believe you, even
when you're telling the truth. (RE: The boy who cried wolf)
Garak: Are you sure that's the point, Doctor?
Bashir: What else could it be? -- Star Trek DS9
Garak: That you should never tell the same lie twice. -- Improbable Cause

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz 2009-11-05 13:42:56 Re: Running some query in low priority
Previous Message Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz 2009-11-05 13:25:20 Re: Running some query in low priority