Re: raid10 hard disk choice

From: Matthew Wakeling <matthew(at)flymine(dot)org>
To: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: raid10 hard disk choice
Date: 2009-05-21 12:59:20
Message-ID: alpine.DEB.2.00.0905211356440.4125@aragorn.flymine.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On Thu, 21 May 2009, Linos wrote:
> i have to buy a new server and in the budget i have (small) i have to
> select one of this two options:
>
> -4 sas 146gb 15k rpm raid10.
> -8 sas 146gb 10k rpm raid10.

It depends what you are doing. I think in most situations, the second
option is better, but there may be a few situations where the reverse is
true.

Basically, the first option will only be faster if you are doing lots of
seeking (small requests) in a single thread. As soon as you go
multi-threaded or are looking at sequential scans, you're better off with
more discs.

Matthew

--
Experience is what allows you to recognise a mistake the second time you
make it.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Merlin Moncure 2009-05-21 14:25:32 Re: raid10 hard disk choice
Previous Message Linos 2009-05-21 12:47:56 raid10 hard disk choice