Re: plpgsql arrays

From: Matthew Wakeling <matthew(at)flymine(dot)org>
To: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: plpgsql arrays
Date: 2009-04-03 14:58:03
Message-ID: alpine.DEB.2.00.0904031556250.21772@aragorn.flymine.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On Fri, 3 Apr 2009, Tom Lane wrote:
> Intuitively, it seems like 1-D "overlaps" is a tractable enough
> operator that you should be able to make something merge-like
> work. But it's more complicated than I think you realize.

It's tractable when the two sides are symmetrical, but not so much when
they aren't. Our "no it isn't" messages obviously crossed on the wire.

Matthew

--
Some people, when confronted with a problem, think "I know, I'll use regular
expressions." Now they have two problems. -- Jamie Zawinski

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Merlin Moncure 2009-04-03 15:02:13 Re: plpgsql arrays
Previous Message Tom Lane 2009-04-03 14:48:31 Re: plpgsql arrays