Re: SSD performance

From: david(at)lang(dot)hm
To: Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: SSD performance
Date: 2009-01-23 18:19:01
Message-ID: alpine.DEB.1.10.0901231016340.12903@asgard.lang.hm
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On Fri, 23 Jan 2009, Merlin Moncure wrote:

> On 1/23/09, david(at)lang(dot)hm <david(at)lang(dot)hm> wrote:
>> the review also includes the Intel X-25E and X-25M drives (along with a
>> variety of SCSI and SATA drives)
>>
>
> The x25-e is a game changer for database storage. It's still a little
> pricey for what it does but who can argue with these numbers?
> http://techreport.com/articles.x/15931/9

take a look at this ram based drive, specificly look at the numbers here
http://techreport.com/articles.x/16255/9

they are about as much above the X25-e as the X25-e is above normal
drives.

David Lang

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Smith 2009-01-23 22:58:58 Re: postgresql 8.3 tps rate
Previous Message Matthew Wakeling 2009-01-23 17:39:28 Re: SSD performance