| From: | david(at)lang(dot)hm |
|---|---|
| To: | Glyn Astill <glynastill(at)yahoo(dot)co(dot)uk> |
| Cc: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: SSD performance |
| Date: | 2009-01-23 12:39:07 |
| Message-ID: | alpine.DEB.1.10.0901230427580.12903@asgard.lang.hm |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On Fri, 23 Jan 2009, Glyn Astill wrote:
>> I spotted a new interesting SSD review. it's a $379
>> 5.25" drive bay device that holds up to 8 DDR2 DIMMS
>> (up to 8G per DIMM) and appears to the system as a SATA
>> drive (or a pair of SATA drives that you can RAID-0 to get
>> past the 300MB/s SATA bottleneck)
>>
>
> Sounds very similar to the Gigabyte iRam drives of a few years ago
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/I-RAM
similar concept, but there are some significant differences
the iRam was limited to 4G, used DDR ram, and used a PCI slot for power
(which can be in
short supply nowdays)
this new drive can go to 64G, uses DDR2 ram (cheaper than DDR nowdays),
gets powered like a normal SATA drive, can use two SATA channels (to be
able to get past the throughput limits of a single SATA interface), and
has a CF card slot to backup the data to if the system powers down.
plus the performance appears to be significantly better (even without
using the second SATA interface)
David Lang
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | david | 2009-01-23 12:52:27 | Re: SSD performance |
| Previous Message | Luke Lonergan | 2009-01-23 11:53:24 | Re: SSD performance |