From: | david(at)lang(dot)hm |
---|---|
To: | Mark Wong <markwkm(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org, Gabrielle Roth <gorthx(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: file system and raid performance |
Date: | 2008-08-05 05:04:42 |
Message-ID: | alpine.DEB.1.10.0808042201010.22058@asgard.lang.hm |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On Mon, 4 Aug 2008, Mark Wong wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> We've thrown together some results from simple i/o tests on Linux
> comparing various file systems, hardware and software raid with a
> little bit of volume management:
>
> http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/HP_ProLiant_DL380_G5_Tuning_Guide
>
> What I'd like to ask of the folks on the list is how relevant is this
> information in helping make decisions such as "What file system should
> I use?" "What performance can I expect from this RAID configuration?"
> I know these kind of tests won't help answer questions like "Which
> file system is most reliable?" but we would like to be as helpful as
> we can.
>
> Any suggestions/comments/criticisms for what would be more relevant or
> interesting also appreciated. We've started with Linux but we'd also
> like to hit some other OS's. I'm assuming FreeBSD would be the other
> popular choice for the DL-380 that we're using.
>
> I hope this is helpful.
it's definantly timely for me (we were having a spirited 'discussion' on
this topic at work today ;-)
what happened with XFS?
you show it as not completing half the tests in the single-disk table and
it's completly missing from the other ones.
what OS/kernel were you running?
if it was linux, which software raid did you try (md or dm) did you use
lvm or raw partitions?
David Lang
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Gregory S. Youngblood | 2008-08-05 05:56:06 | Re: file system and raid performance |
Previous Message | Mark Wong | 2008-08-05 04:54:36 | file system and raid performance |