From: | Kris Jurka <books(at)ejurka(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Daniele Varrazzo <daniele(dot)varrazzo(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: XA Xid to PostgreSQL transaction ID |
Date: | 2010-10-19 19:06:25 |
Message-ID: | alpine.BSO.2.00.1010191459480.26102@leary.csoft.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-jdbc |
On Thu, 14 Oct 2010, Daniele Varrazzo wrote:
> I have implemented two-phase commit into the Python PostgreSQL driver
> psycopg2. As the Python DBAPI is XA inspired, the transaction IDs it
> demands to handle are composed by triples (format_id, gtrid, bqual).
> PostgreSQL instead asks for plain strings as transaction IDs.
>
> I'd like to implement the mapping algorithm exactly the way the JDBC
> driver does, as it would allow tools written in Python to interoperate
> to ones written in Java and understand each other the XA components of
> the transaction IDs.
>
I'm not sure how valuable that will really be. This information should
really only be useful to a transaction manager(TM), so I'm not sure what
interoperability would gain. No TM is going to start a Java transaction
and later try to recover it using a Python client (or the other way
around).
> As a test I have in the test suite the triple (42, 'gtrid', 'bqual')
> is converted into the string '42_Z3RyaWQ=_YnF1YWw=': I'd like to know,
> if possible, if this is the same result obtained by the JDBC driver.
> Alternatively, if you can provide me one or more known triple ->
> string transformation examples, I can check them and add them to the
> test suite.
Yes, this is the same result as the JDBC driver.
Kris Jurka
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael musset | 2010-10-19 19:31:33 | JDBC4 with SQLXML and postgresql-8.4-702.jdbc4.jar |
Previous Message | Kris Jurka | 2010-10-19 18:47:41 | Re: DatabaseMetaData.getTablePrivileges() |