Re: PG 9.0 release timetable

From: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
To: Thom Brown <thombrown(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PG 9.0 release timetable
Date: 2010-05-31 13:52:54
Message-ID: alpine.BSF.2.00.1005311050590.75550@hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, 31 May 2010, Thom Brown wrote:

> On 31 May 2010 09:33, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>>
>> We're currently at 4 weeks since last beta, with no new beta in sight.
>
> My understanding was beta 2 would be out on 7th June. Is that changing?

Yes, but Simon is correct in that 4-5 weeks between betas is a long time,
when most bugs will be reported (and hopefully fixed) relatively quickly
after a beta is released ... RC should be held to a more 'release
standard', but beta's should be closer to a snapshot standard, with a more
short/fixed timeframe so that debuggers aren't hitting the same bugs that
were reported (and fixed), weeks earlier ...

----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Hosting Solutions S.A.
scrappy(at)hub(dot)org http://www.hub.org

Yahoo:yscrappy Skype: hub.org ICQ:7615664 MSN:scrappy(at)hub(dot)org

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dave Page 2010-05-31 14:14:06 Re: PG 9.0 release timetable
Previous Message Thom Brown 2010-05-31 13:22:17 Re: PG 9.0 release timetable