From: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Greg Sabino Mullane <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: List traffic |
Date: | 2010-05-14 14:38:39 |
Message-ID: | alpine.BSF.2.00.1005141134450.22297@hub.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin pgsql-chat pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, 14 May 2010, Greg Sabino Mullane wrote:
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: RIPEMD160
>
>
>> ... is there a reason why, other the fact that we don't do now, that we
>> can't just put in a restriction against cross posting altogether?
>
> Because that would be shooting ourselves in the foot. Cross-posting
> is often desirable. If we had a clearer distinction of list topics, I
> might support such a move, but we don't, so I can't.
But, its the cross-posting, IMHO, that reduces the distinction ...
>> ... and, for those that have been here awhile, who "should know better",
>> why isn't there any self-management of this sort of stuff in the first
>> place?
>
> What would you have us do?
Redirect users ... if user sends a query performance related question to
-general, respond back with -general as the CC, To as -performance and a
Reply-To header of -performance ... that way those on -general know that
its been redirected, but *hopefully* users replying will honor the
-performance redirect ...
----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Hosting Solutions S.A.
scrappy(at)hub(dot)org http://www.hub.org
Yahoo:yscrappy Skype: hub.org ICQ:7615664 MSN:scrappy(at)hub(dot)org
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2010-05-14 14:42:09 | Re: List traffic |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2010-05-14 14:26:15 | Re: List traffic |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2010-05-14 14:42:09 | Re: List traffic |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2010-05-14 14:26:15 | Re: List traffic |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2010-05-14 14:42:09 | Re: List traffic |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2010-05-14 14:26:15 | Re: List traffic |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2010-05-14 14:42:09 | Re: List traffic |
Previous Message | Kevin Grittner | 2010-05-14 14:32:32 | Re: Row-level Locks & SERIALIZABLE transactions, postgres vs. Oracle |