From: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | nagata(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp, ranier(dot)vf(at)gmail(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: corruption of WAL page header is never reported |
Date: | 2021-09-02 12:52:00 |
Message-ID: | afba2177-f890-a751-65a5-09a2f217e13b@oss.nttdata.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2021/09/02 16:26, Kyotaro Horiguchi wrote:
> I believe errmsg_buf is an interface to emit error messages dedicated
> to xlogreader that doesn't have an access to elog facility, and
> xlogreader doesn't (or ought not to or expect to) suppose
> non-xlogreader callback functions set the variable. In that sense I
> don't think theoriginally proposed patch is proper for the reason that
> the non-xlogreader callback function may set errmsg_buf. This is what
> I meant by the word "modularity".
>
> For that reason I avoided in my second proposal to call
> XLogReaderValidatePageHeader() at all while not in standby mode,
> because calling the validator function while in non-standby mode
> results in the non-xlogreader function return errmsg_buf. Of course
> we can instead always consume errmsg_buf in the function but I don't
> like to shadow the caller's task.
Understood. Thanks for clarifying this!
> Does that makes sense?
Yes, I'm fine with your latest patch.
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
Advanced Computing Technology Center
Research and Development Headquarters
NTT DATA CORPORATION
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Thomas Munro | 2021-09-02 13:01:43 | Re: stat() vs ERROR_DELETE_PENDING, round N + 1 |
Previous Message | Fujii Masao | 2021-09-02 12:47:35 | Re: Fix typo in comments |