Re: Dropping postgres as a whole.

From: "Gavin M(dot) Roy" <gmr(at)myyearbook(dot)com>
To: "Brian Hurt" <bhurt(at)janestcapital(dot)com>
Cc: "Josh Berkus" <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, "PostgreSQL Advocacy List" <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Dropping postgres as a whole.
Date: 2007-09-28 14:32:56
Message-ID: af1bce590709280732v80fba20q5c3476e75cc31e45@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

LOL thank you for a good laugh.

On 9/28/07, Brian Hurt <bhurt(at)janestcapital(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Josh Berkus wrote:
>
> > JD,
> >
> >> Why don't we just stop this whole PostgreSQL->Postgres->Postgre junk
> and
> >> just say, PostgreSQL, also referred to as PG.
> >
> >
> > I think PG is trademarked by the Motion Picture Association of
> > America. And you *know* you don't want to tangle with their attorneys.
> >
> > ;-)
> >
> > I vote for "UltimateDB".
> >
>
> Given the length of this thread, I vote for "Digres".
>
> Brian
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Guido Barosio 2007-09-28 14:41:46 Re: Cafeconf 2007
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2007-09-28 14:21:27 Re: name Re: Dropping postgres as a whole.