Re: The naming question WAS: Theme of this release: Performance?

My 0.02 is it should be done at a major point release such as 9.0.
Perhaps with the emphasis on maturity and speed improvements, 8.3 can
be 9. Refined name, a more mature product... Sounds like a good
marketing move to me.

Just musing,

Gavin

On 8/27/07, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:
> All,
>
> > It is still the case that changing the name would involve a lot of tedious
> > effort and hunting down references. Also, we don't have nearly as good
> > control of the various postgres.* domains as we do of postgresql.*.
> > (notably, postgres.net belongs to some unknown individual who refuses to
> > sell it to me).
>
> Update on this; Aaron got in touch with me and I think we can work something
> out *if* we decide to change the name.
>
> --
> Josh Berkus
> PostgreSQL @ Sun
> San Francisco
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
>