From: | Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Rich Shepard <rshepard(at)appl-ecosys(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: PK issue: serial sequence needs updating |
Date: | 2020-11-17 23:53:04 |
Message-ID: | aebfdd1d-c38f-b1b7-51f4-a7842d4b3ec1@aklaver.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On 11/17/20 3:46 PM, Rich Shepard wrote:
> Running postgresql-12.2-x86_64-1_SBo on Slackware-14.2/x86_64.
>
> My restructed business database has populated tables, but the primary keys
> are not aware of the current maximum number since the table rows were added
> external to postgres and read in using psql.
>
> For example, I'm trying to add a new person to the people table which
> currently has 484 rows. The insert into statement provides all columns but
> the first, the PK (person_nbr) which is an int with an associated
> people_person_nbr_seq. Passing the insert statement to psql is rejected
> because there's already a person_nbr=1.
>
> How do I inform the sequence that nextval should be 485? Or, do I drop that
> sequence and restore it so it reads all existing table rows and their PKs?
>
> If I didn't clearly explain myself, ask and I'll try again. :-)
https://www.postgresql.org/docs/12/sql-altersequence.html
ALTER SEQUENCE people_person_nbr_seq RESTART 485;
>
> TIA,
>
> Rich
>
>
>
>
--
Adrian Klaver
adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Rich Shepard | 2020-11-18 00:01:47 | Re: PK issue: serial sequence needs updating [RESOLVED] |
Previous Message | Rich Shepard | 2020-11-17 23:46:58 | PK issue: serial sequence needs updating |