Re: Is postgres_fdw "safe"?

From: Ron <ronljohnsonjr(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Is postgres_fdw "safe"?
Date: 2023-10-20 16:33:46
Message-ID: ae6e985e-f6bb-4f7c-b036-5883f013105f@gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On 10/20/23 03:29, Marcin Borkowski wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I noticed that the docs for postgres_fdw lack the clause about it being
> "trusted". Does that mean that `create extension postgres_fdw` poses
> any known security risks? If so, what should I do to minimize them?

I think a better question to ask is if extensions are implicitly trusted
unless explicitly marked untrusted.

--
Born in Arizona, moved to Babylonia.

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2023-10-20 16:37:29 Re: Is postgres_fdw "safe"?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2023-10-20 14:40:43 Re: PostgreSQL C++ Interface version 14.9 using static library instead of shared library