From: | "Sid Murthy" <sid(dot)murthy(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Mike <1100100(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-novice(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL a slow DB? |
Date: | 2006-04-09 13:51:55 |
Message-ID: | ae17b9cc0604090651y160ed397p6bec93ce62f99a63@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-novice |
MySQL 5 is quickly catching up. Maybe someone can elaborate on the
advantages of Postgres over MySQL 5?
thanks,
-Sid
On 4/9/06, Mike <1100100(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Mr. Momjian,
> Congratulations on the new position at EnterpriseDB.
>
>
> On 4/8/06, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us > wrote:
> >
> > ebcorder(at)rockwellcollins(dot)com wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi All
> > >
> > > I started using PostgreSQL\Postgis in January. Lately I have been
> > > reading on the internet many rumblings about PostgreSQL being slower
> > than
> > > MySQL/SQLLite etc etc. Comparisons made were routine inserts ,
> > updates,
> > > and deletes. Is any of this true? If so,are there methods to speed
> > > things up? I used the Explain Analyze command on portgesSQL it
> > seemed
> > > fast although I have not run any other DB's.
> > > I know when comparison tests are performed they can be tilted on these
> >
> > > internet sites. But I see so many people declaring PostgreSQL to be
> > the
> > > slowest I am thinking where there is smoke there's fire.
> >
> > Lots of people still think Elvis is alive. :-)
> >
> > --
> > Bruce Momjian http://candle.pha.pa.us
> >
> > + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
> >
> > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> > TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
> >
>
>
--
Sid Murthy
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Relaxin | 2006-04-09 13:53:42 | Re: Plain ANSI C Compiled on Win32 |
Previous Message | Mike | 2006-04-09 12:27:47 | Re: PostgreSQL a slow DB? |