From: | Jürgen Purtz <juergen(at)purtz(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Anastasia Lubennikova <a(dot)lubennikova(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Change JOIN tutorial to focus more on explicit joins |
Date: | 2020-12-01 08:38:20 |
Message-ID: | acf6b4ca-e8a2-4646-eb6f-85e931af7d86@purtz.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-docs pgsql-hackers |
On 30.11.20 21:25, David G. Johnston wrote:
> Sorry, I managed to overlook the most recent patch.
>
> I admitted my use of parentheses was incorrect and I don't see anyone
> else defending them. Please remove them.
>
> Minor typos:
>
> "the database compare" -> needs an "s" (compares)
>
> "In this case, the definition how to compare their rows." -> remove,
> redundant with the first sentence
>
> "The results from the older implicit syntax, and the newer explicit
> JOIN/ON syntax, are identical" -> move the commas around to what is
> shown here
>
> David J.
>
>
OK. Patch attached.
--
J. Purtz
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
0004-query.patch | text/x-patch | 6.5 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2020-12-01 12:39:04 | Re: Consistent reference to RFCs in the documentation |
Previous Message | Fujii Masao | 2020-12-01 08:21:15 | Re: index items for pg_stat_progress_xxx views |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | vignesh C | 2020-12-01 08:45:17 | Re: Printing backtrace of postgres processes |
Previous Message | Masahiko Sawada | 2020-12-01 08:31:00 | Re: autovac issue with large number of tables |