Re: snapbuild woes

From: Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl>
To: Petr Jelinek <petr(dot)jelinek(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Subject: Re: snapbuild woes
Date: 2017-05-09 10:30:15
Message-ID: acc79defb4a3d809cb36b84dcaf1b37f@xs4all.nl
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2017-05-09 11:50, Petr Jelinek wrote:
> On 09/05/17 10:59, Erik Rijkers wrote:
>> On 2017-05-09 10:50, Petr Jelinek wrote:
>>> On 09/05/17 00:03, Erik Rijkers wrote:
>>>> On 2017-05-05 02:00, Andres Freund wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Could you have a look?

[...]

> I rebased the above mentioned patch to apply to the patches Andres
> sent,
> if you could try to add it on top of what you have and check if it
> still
> fails, that would be helpful.

I suppose you mean these; but they do not apply anymore:

20170505/0001-WIP-Fix-off-by-one-around-GetLastImportantRecPtr.patch
20170505/0002-WIP-Possibly-more-robust-snapbuild-approach.patch

Andres, any change you could update them?

alternatively I could use the older version again..

thanks,

Erik Rijkers

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ashutosh Bapat 2017-05-09 10:35:03 Re: no test coverage for ALTER FOREIGN DATA WRAPPER name HANDLER ...
Previous Message Thomas Munro 2017-05-09 10:29:04 Re: transition table behavior with inheritance appears broken (was: Declarative partitioning - another take)