Re: pgsql: Make archiver process an auxiliary process.

From: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>
To: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Fujii Masao <fujii(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-committers <pgsql-committers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pgsql: Make archiver process an auxiliary process.
Date: 2021-06-16 04:29:29
Message-ID: acb63277-66fc-a181-c735-27eebda575d3@oss.nttdata.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers

On 2021/06/12 19:36, Thomas Munro wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 5:14 PM Fujii Masao <fujii(at)postgresql(dot)org> wrote:
>> Make archiver process an auxiliary process.
>>
>> This commit changes WAL archiver process so that it's treated as
>> an auxiliary process and can use shared memory. This is an infrastructure
>> patch required for upcoming shared-memory based stats collector patch
>> series. These patch series basically need any processes including archiver
>> that can report the statistics to access to shared memory. Since this patch
>> itself is useful to simplify the code and when users monitor the status of
>> archiver, it's committed separately in advance.
>
> I think this needs to handle ProcSignalBarrierPending. Otherwise,
> code that tries to use proc signal barriers (like CF #2962 and #2602)
> might hang forever when an archiver is running.

Thanks for the comment! I will investigate this.

Regards,

--
Fujii Masao
Advanced Computing Technology Center
Research and Development Headquarters
NTT DATA CORPORATION

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-committers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Heikki Linnakangas 2021-06-16 09:47:49 pgsql: Fix outdated comment that talked about seek position of WAL file
Previous Message Tom Lane 2021-06-15 20:12:15 pgsql: Update another variant expected-result file.